Personal injury claim

Defective Equipment Claims UK - Faulty Tools, Machinery and More

When a tool, machine or piece of work equipment fails and injures you, UK law gives you more than one route to compensation - and in most cases a stronger route than ordinary negligence. The Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 imposes strict liability on employers for injuries caused by defects in work equipment. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 imposes strict liability on the manufacturer or supplier of a defective product. Either route means you don't have to prove someone was careless - just that the equipment was defective and caused the injury.

SRA
regulated
APIL
members
Law Society
panel
Legal
Ombudsman
MedCo
accredited
No win
no fee

When a tool, machine or piece of work equipment fails and injures you, UK law gives you more than one route to compensation - and in most cases a stronger route than ordinary negligence. The Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 imposes strict liability on employers for injuries caused by defects in work equipment. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 imposes strict liability on the manufacturer or supplier of a defective product. Either route means you don't have to prove someone was careless - just that the equipment was defective and caused the injury.

When a tool, machine or piece of work equipment fails and injures you, UK law gives you more than one route to compensation - and in most cases a stronger route than ordinary negligence. The Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 imposes strict liability on employers for injuries caused by defects in work equipment. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 imposes strict liability on the manufacturer or supplier of a defective product. Either route means you don't have to prove someone was careless - just that the equipment was defective and caused the injury.

The three claim routes

1. Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 - strict liability against the employer

Section 1 of the ELDEA 1969 states that where an employee suffers personal injury in the course of employment as a result of a defect in equipment provided by the employer, the injury is deemed to be attributable to the employer's negligence - even where the actual fault was in the manufacturer or supplier.

In practical terms:

  • You don't have to prove your employer was careless in buying, maintaining or inspecting the equipment.

2. Consumer Protection Act 1987 - strict liability against the producer

Part I of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 imposes strict liability on the 'producer' of defective products - typically the manufacturer, own-brander, or importer into the UK. Section 3 defines a product as 'defective' if its safety is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect.

Claim features:

  • Strict liability - no need to prove carelessness.

3. Common-law negligence

An employer must take reasonable care to provide safe equipment, maintained in safe condition. A manufacturer owes a duty of care to end users (the Donoghue v Stevenson line).

A note on PUWER after 2013

The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 used to create automatic civil liability for breach. Section 69 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 changed that - since October 2013, a breach of PUWER doesn't automatically give rise to civil liability. Instead, PUWER breaches are used as evidence of common-law negligence.

What counts as 'defective'?

Manufacturing defects - The specific item was faulty at the point of manufacture.

Design defects - The product is unsafe in design.

Warning / instruction defects - The product is safe in itself but was sold without adequate warnings.

Maintenance-related defects - The equipment was safe when supplied but has become defective through poor maintenance.

Common defective-equipment scenarios

Hand tools - Hammers with loose heads; saws with faulty blade guards; wrenches that slip.

Power tools - Grinders with malfunctioning discs; drills with electrical faults; circular saws with defective blade guards; nail guns misfiring.

Heavy machinery - Forklifts with brake failures; presses with failed emergency stops; conveyors with faulty guards. See factory accident claims.

Vehicles - Company cars / vans with brake failures, steering faults, tyre blowouts. See car accident claims.

Personal protective equipment - Helmets that fracture below rated specification; harnesses that fail; safety boots without promised steel toe-cap.

Scaffolding and access equipment - Ladders with structural failures; scaffold components with hidden cracks; MEWP components failing.

Lifting equipment - Hoists, cranes, slings, chains. LOLER-inspected, but inspections can miss defects.

Chemical products - Solvents, cleaning products, paints.

Office equipment - See office accident claims.

Who is the defendant?

  • For ELDEA 1969 claims - your employer (via EL insurance).

Time limits

  • Standard personal injury: three years from the accident or date of knowledge.

See time limits.

Evidence

  • The equipment itself - preserve it. Photograph it immediately.

Funding - no win, no fee

Every defective equipment claim we handle runs on a Conditional Fee Agreement. See no win no fee explained.

Frequently asked questions

Under the Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969, the employer is deemed liable for defects in equipment provided, even if the fault was the manufacturer's.
Yes - under the CPA 1987, the importer into the UK is liable equally with the producer.
The CPA 1987 10-year long-stop closes the strict-liability route against the manufacturer. But the ELDEA 1969 strict liability against the employer survives.
No. CPA 1987 protects anyone injured by a defective product.
Against the manufacturer under CPA 1987, yes.
Under the ELDEA 1969 strict liability, no - a defect is a defect, regardless of service history.
Moderate claims with admitted liability: 12-18 months. Contested cases: 18-30 months.
Some contributory negligence may apply where user error contributed. But a defective product that injured someone during normal / foreseeable use is still actionable. Figures draw on the Judicial College Guidelines 17th edition (April 2024). Every claim depends on its evidence; no outcome is guaranteed. Casibus works with SRA-regulated personal injury solicitors on a Conditional Fee Agreement basis.
SRA-regulated specialist solicitors
Judicial College Guidelines 17th edition
APIL accredited
25% success fee cap
Free claim check, no obligation
UK-wide coverage
ATE insurance included
No win, no fee
Real outcomes

What clients say after settlement

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Honest answer in fifteen minutes. Matched me with a specialist who knew my case type, and stayed on it for eighteen months. I never had to chase anyone.
S. AhmedRTA claim, Bradford / Settled 2025
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
I had been turned away by two other firms. Casibus actually read my records, spotted the causation angle, and ran a clinical negligence claim that settled at five figures.
M. WalkerMedical negligence / Settled 2024
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Straightforward, no jargon, no pressure. They told me exactly what to expect at every stage, and when the settlement came through it was higher than I expected.
J. O'ConnorWorkplace accident / Settled 2024
Track record

Numbers that matter to you.

Compensation recovered
£143m+
Paid out across claim types since 2015
Client and solicitor handshake
Clients supported
35,000+
Success rate
98%
Client rating
4.9 ★★★★★
Legal consultation
Average settlement time
9-18 months

Ready to start your defective equipment claims?

Free initial consultation. No win, no fee. Specialist solicitor matched to your case type.

Call now Free Check