Personal injury claim

Supermarket Accident Claims UK - All Major Chains

UK supermarkets see hundreds of millions of customer visits a year - and a well-documented share of those visits end in avoidable injuries. Wet floor slips, trolley-related falls, falling stock, broken display furniture, trips on damaged flooring. If you were injured in Tesco, Sainsbury's, Asda, Morrisons, Lidl, Aldi, Co-op, Iceland, M&S Food, Waitrose, or any other chain - and the supermarket failed to take reasonable care to keep you safe - you have a claim.

SRA
regulated
APIL
members
Law Society
panel
Legal
Ombudsman
MedCo
accredited
No win
no fee

UK supermarkets see hundreds of millions of customer visits a year - and a well-documented share of those visits end in avoidable injuries. Wet floor slips, trolley-related falls, falling stock, broken display furniture, trips on damaged flooring. If you were injured in Tesco, Sainsbury's, Asda, Morrisons, Lidl, Aldi, Co-op, Iceland, M&S Food, Waitrose, or any other chain - and the supermarket failed to take reasonable care to keep you safe - you have a claim.

UK supermarkets see hundreds of millions of customer visits a year - and a well-documented share of those visits end in avoidable injuries. Wet floor slips, trolley-related falls, falling stock, broken display furniture, trips on damaged flooring. If you were injured in Tesco, Sainsbury's, Asda, Morrisons, Lidl, Aldi, Co-op, Iceland, M&S Food, Waitrose, or any other chain - and the supermarket failed to take reasonable care to keep you safe - you have a claim.

This page explains how UK supermarket accident claims work: the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 framework, the Ward v Tesco system test that decides most of these cases, the specific types of incidents we see, CCTV preservation urgency, and what you could recover. Every case is handled on a no win, no fee basis.

Supermarket accident claims run under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957. Section 2 requires the occupier - the supermarket chain - to take such care as is reasonable to see that customers are reasonably safe using the premises for the purposes for which they are invited to be there.

The leading supermarket-specific case is Ward v Tesco Stores Ltd [1976] 1 WLR 810. The Court of Appeal held that where a customer slips on a supermarket spillage, the burden shifts to the supermarket to show it had a reasonable cleaning and inspection system and that the system was actually followed. You don't have to prove the spillage had been there for any specific period - the supermarket has to prove reasonable care. That's a significant claimant-friendly position.

In practice, claims succeed where:

  • The spillage / defect had been there long enough that reasonable inspection would have caught it.

Claims against named supermarket chains

Each major UK chain has its own PL insurance and claims handling team. Functionally, a claim against Tesco looks much like one against Asda or Sainsbury's - the legal test is identical, and all the major chains operate cleaning rotas of some kind. Differences in practice tend to be about record-keeping quality and insurer response speed.

  • Tesco - claims handled by Tesco Insurance or Tesco's PL insurer; large claims volume; relatively responsive handling.

Your solicitor doesn't care which chain - the claim process is effectively the same.

The common supermarket accident scenarios

Slips on wet floors

Cleaning in progress without signs; customer spillages (broken jars, leaking dairy, dropped drinks, fruit juices); rain-tracked wet entrances; cleaning-fluid slippery residues. Most common accident category; Ward v Tesco system test governs.

Trips on damaged flooring

Loose or raised floor tiles, worn-through carpets at entrances, unmarked threshold changes. Often longer-standing defects that reasonable inspection should have identified.

Trips on stock / cages / roll-cages

Shelf-filling staff leaving cages in aisles, dropped stock, roll-cages obstructing walkways. Breach of the occupier's duty to keep walking routes clear.

Falling stock / shelves collapsing

Badly-stacked heavy items falling from height; entire shelves collapsing (rarer but catastrophic). Significant injuries possible.

Damaged baskets and trolleys

Trolley wheels falling off; basket handles breaking; trolley locks failing in car parks. Supermarkets have a duty to maintain equipment.

Car park accidents

Potholes, poor lighting, trolley-related injuries, icy conditions without gritting. Outdoor areas are still the supermarket's responsibility where they control the space.

Accidents at the checkout

Conveyor-belt injuries; self-checkout machines malfunctioning; baggage-area trips.

Cut / struck by damaged fixtures

Broken shelving edges, chipped fridge doors, damaged stock racks. The occupier's duty to maintain the premises safe.

Entrance / door incidents

Automatic doors closing on customers; doors malfunctioning; trolley incidents at tight doorways.

Evidence and CCTV preservation

Supermarket claims are heavily evidence-driven. The key items:

  • Accident book entry - ask for the incident to be logged; request a copy or photograph the entry.

What to do after a supermarket accident

  1. Get medical attention - A&E or GP.

How much compensation could you receive?

Supermarket claims are valued on the standard PI framework - general damages against JCG 17th edition plus special damages. Representative ranges:

  • Minor ankle injury: ~£2,690 - £14,020

Plus special damages - loss of earnings, treatment, travel, care, clothing/personal effects damaged. Typical supermarket claim settlements: £2,000-£5,000 for minor injuries; £5,000-£20,000 for moderate; well into five / six figures for serious (e.g. hip fracture in an older claimant requiring surgery and rehab). See how much compensation.

Contributory negligence and clear warning signs

Where a warning sign was clearly displayed, some contributory negligence may apply - though courts are generally resistant to the 'you should have seen the sign' argument where the actual hazard extended beyond the signed area or where alternative safe routes weren't available. Reductions typically 10-25%. Simple inattention (texting, looking at shelves rather than the floor) is not a common basis for reduction - supermarkets invite customers to look at products, not walk with eyes down.

See split liability.

Funding - no win, no fee

Every supermarket claim we handle runs on a Conditional Fee Agreement. No upfront fees. If the claim wins, the success fee is capped at 25% of general damages and past losses. If it fails, you pay nothing (subject to CFA and ATE terms). See no win no fee explained.

Time limits

Three years from the accident or date of knowledge under the Limitation Act 1980. Children - three years from their 18th birthday. See time limits.

Frequently asked questions

Possibly. A sign isn't always a complete defence. The claim can still succeed where the sign wasn't visible from your approach, the wet area extended beyond the signed area, or there was no alternative safe route. Each case turns on its facts.
Under Ward v Tesco, the burden is on the supermarket to prove its cleaning system was reasonable and that the system was followed. 'It had just happened' is only a defence if the supermarket can show a genuinely reasonable inspection system. Many can't in practice.
No, but it makes it harder. You'll need other contemporaneous evidence. CCTV (if preserved) is particularly valuable.
Yes - claim run by parent as litigation friend. Children are particularly vulnerable to falling heavy items. See claiming on behalf of a child.
Straightforward claims with admitted liability: 6-12 months. Contested claims: 12-24 months.
No, and it doesn't matter. The claim is against the chain's insurer. Shop wherever you want.
Minor injury: £1,500-£4,000. Moderate injury with time off work: £5,000-£20,000. Serious injury (fractures, older claimants): £20,000 and up.
SRA-regulated specialist solicitors
Judicial College Guidelines 17th edition
APIL accredited
25% success fee cap
Free claim check, no obligation
UK-wide coverage
ATE insurance included
No win, no fee
Real outcomes

What clients say after settlement

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Honest answer in fifteen minutes. Matched me with a specialist who knew my case type, and stayed on it for eighteen months. I never had to chase anyone.
S. AhmedRTA claim, Bradford / Settled 2025
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
I had been turned away by two other firms. Casibus actually read my records, spotted the causation angle, and ran a clinical negligence claim that settled at five figures.
M. WalkerMedical negligence / Settled 2024
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Straightforward, no jargon, no pressure. They told me exactly what to expect at every stage, and when the settlement came through it was higher than I expected.
J. O'ConnorWorkplace accident / Settled 2024
Track record

Numbers that matter to you.

Compensation recovered
£143m+
Paid out across claim types since 2015
Client and solicitor handshake
Clients supported
35,000+
Success rate
98%
Client rating
4.9 ★★★★★
Legal consultation
Average settlement time
9-18 months

Ready to start your supermarket accident claims?

Free initial consultation. No win, no fee. Specialist solicitor matched to your case type.

Call now Free Check